> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://globalfeed.ai/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# OpenArt tops the anime video ranking, and its rival costs eight times more
- URL: https://globalfeed.ai/en/physion-labs-publishes-the-physion-arc-1-0-anime-track-eight-video-agents-19-metrics/
- Published: 2026-09-08T20:41:39.000Z
- Updated: 2026-09-08T20:46:29.000Z
- Description: Physion-Arc 1.0 Anime Track scored eight agents on 19 metrics. OpenArt leads with 77.8. Read the cost column and the table shifts: Invideo charges $50.7 per video for 69.2 points, while MiniMax delivers 68.5 for $6.3.
- Author: GlobalFeed Editor
- Tags: Physion Labs, Physion-Arc, video agents, anime, benchmark, x-Physion_Labs, dil-en, elle, video, x-gitti

Physion Labs has added an **Anime Track** to **Physion-Arc 1.0**, its benchmark for video agents. Eight agents were run on the same 100 anime prompts and every video was scored on **19 metrics**. The agents were tested across three input modes: text only, single reference image, and multiple reference images.

## The ranking

| # | Agent                | Overall quality | Cost per video |
| - | -------------------- | --------------- | -------------- |
| 1 | OpenArt              | 77.8            | $21.3          |
| 2 | Anime Agent 1.0      | 75.6            | $25.0          |
| 3 | Invideo Agent One    | 69.2            | $50.7          |
| 4 | Runway Agent 2.0     | 68.7            | $10.5          |
| 5 | MiniMax Hub v2.0.2   | 68.5            | $6.3           |
| 6 | Luma Creative Agents | 64.3            | $16.4          |
| 7 | Flova 1.0            | 63.8            | $2.5           |
| 8 | Utopai PAI 2.0       | 61.3            | $20.4          |

## Read the cost column

Read the ranking alone and third place looks good. Read it with the price and something else appears: **Invideo Agent One charges $50.7 per video for 69.2 points, while MiniMax Hub returns 68.5 for $6.3**. Eight times the money for 0.7 of a point. In the same vein, **Flova 1.0 scores 63.8 at $2.5**, so for anyone willing to give up 14 points to save 19 dollars a video, the table inverts.

## Three dimensions, not one winner

The metrics group into three headings: **narrative coherence** (7 metrics), **animetic language** (7 metrics) and **production quality** (5 metrics). OpenArt takes the overall lead, but narrative coherence is led by **Anime Agent 1.0**, 82.9 against 82.3\. OpenArt is clearly ahead on animetic language (68.6) and production quality (84.5).

The distinction matters. Narrative coherence measures whether a character stays the same character and whether a prop survives from scene to scene. Animetic language measures directorial choices: camera, composition, pacing, sound. An agent can tell a coherent story and direct it badly, or the reverse.

## Half the metrics are subjective

The board labels every metric **objective** or **subjective**, which is an honest split. The objective side is high and tightly bunched: on technical coherence all eight sit between 91.8 and 99.3, and on audio stability everyone except the last-placed 48.1 is above 77\. The spread opens on the **subjective** metrics: emotional intent runs from 38.6 to 62.9, audio integration from 31.6 to 67.9\. Technically the agents have converged; where they separate is direction.

Physion Labs says that when a new agent joins the pool it **recomputes results across all 100 prompts**, because an expanded comparison set shifts the subjective scores. Worth keeping in mind while reading: these numbers are not absolute, they are relative to this pool of eight.

Source: [Physion-Arc 1.0 Anime Track leaderboard](https://physionlabs.ai/leaderboards/arc-anime-1.0?ref=globalfeed.ai).