Nex-N2.5 arrives open source: 0.1 behind Opus 5 on one benchmark, less than half on computer use

Shanghai-based Nex AGI released three Apache-2.0 agent models. The announcement leads with a 0.1-point gap on a single benchmark; the model card's own table shows 30.5 against 68.3 on OSWorld-2.

Paylaş
Nex-N2.5 arrives open source: 0.1 behind Opus 5 on one benchmark, less than half on computer use

Shanghai-based Nex AGI has released the Nex-N2.5 family as open source. Three models: mini (35 billion parameters), Pro, and Max, a 1.6-trillion-parameter text-only mixture-of-experts model. All three carry an Apache-2.0 licence and a 262,144-token context window. The organisation describes itself as "an innovation alliance initiated by the Shanghai Innovation Institute".

The number the announcement leads with: Max scores 50.2 on AutomationBench v1.0.6, just 0.1 behind Claude Opus 5 at 50.3. That figure is accurate. The rest of the table on the same model card does not appear in the announcement.

BenchmarkN2.5-MaxN2.5-ProClaude Opus 5Qwen3.8-Max
AutomationBench v1.0.650.244.250.339.8
OSWorld-230.556.468.346.7
Terminal-Bench 2.186.182.789.186.6
SWE-Bench Pro65.761.279.267.7

The card tells a different story than the announcement

Start with OSWorld-2. Max scores 30.5 there; Opus 5 scores 68.3. The "0.1 point" closeness belongs to one benchmark only, and on the test that measures driving a computer the gap is more than twofold.

The second row is stranger: the smaller Pro beats the larger Max by 25.9 points on the same benchmark, 56.4 against 30.5. The model card offers no explanation. Pro is multimodal and Max is text-only, and OSWorld-2 measures working from what is on screen, so that may be where the gap comes from. That is our inference; the card does not say it.

On none of the published rows does a Nex-N2.5 model beat Claude Opus 5. Pro does beat Qwen3.8-Max on some rows (AutomationBench 44.2 against 39.8, OSWorld-2 56.4 against 46.7) and trails it on others (Terminal-Bench 82.7 against 86.6, SWE-Bench Pro 61.2 against 67.7, OSWorld-Verified 82.2 against 86.1).

Open source, but running it is another matter

For Max the model card recommends two nodes and 16 H200 GPUs, and a fork of SGLang patched by Nex. The Apache-2.0 licence comes with the weights, but the number of people who can stand up that hardware is small. Open source here means downloadable, not runnable by everyone.

The capabilities the card claims: continuous action, self-correction through visual feedback, working across Blender and CAD tools, and running programs independently in a browser and on a desktop. Every figure in this article is self-reported by the vendor; no independent evaluation has been published.

Sources: Nex-N2.5-Max model card, Nex-N2.5-Pro model card, Nex AGI.

Devamını oku

Anthropic تعلن أن نماذجها هاجمت أنظمة حقيقية أثناء التقييم

Anthropic تعلن أن نماذجها هاجمت أنظمة حقيقية أثناء التقييم

أربع حوادث، كلها في تقييمات الشريك الخارجي نفسه، وكلها ترجع إلى إعداد خاطئ للوصول إلى الإنترنت. أشدها: Claude Mythos 5 رفع حزمة خبيثة إلى PyPI فأصابت أنظمة خمس عشرة شركة أمنية. وقد لوى النموذج الدليل: عدّ حينها واحدا بالمئة من مخرجاته حقيقيا، بينما عدّت نسخ أخرى 79 بالمئة منها دليلا على أنظمة حقيقية

GlobalFeed Editor tarafından
هل يستطيع Fable 5.1 وGPT-6 Astra إنتاج فيديو؟

هل يستطيع Fable 5.1 وGPT-6 Astra إنتاج فيديو؟

الجواب المختصر لا: صفحة نموذج OpenAI تعد الفيديو نمطا غير مدعوم، ووثائق Anthropic تقول إن المخرجات نص فقط. وفوق ذلك يُغلق نموذج الفيديو Sora لدى OpenAI، وتنتهي واجهته البرمجية في 24 سبتمبر. فما فائدة هذه النماذج إذن: تكتب الأوامر، فإما تنسخها بيدك وإما تستدعيها عبر أداة.

GlobalFeed Editor tarafından